IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (COMM) No. 772/2016 + CS(COMM) No. 570/2017 + CS(COMM) No.571/2017 + CS(COMM) No.
![No protection under Designs Act for a Trade variant which is a combination of known designs: Delhi HC No protection under Designs Act for a Trade variant which is a combination of known designs: Delhi HC](https://taxguru.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/No-protection-under-Designs-Act-for-a-Trade-variant-which-is-a-combination-of-known-designs-Delhi-HC.jpg)
No protection under Designs Act for a Trade variant which is a combination of known designs: Delhi HC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (COMM) No. 772/2016 + CS(COMM) No. 570/2017 + CS(COMM) No.571/2017 + CS(COMM) No.
![India: Suits pertaining to a registered design also constituting a trade mark not maintainable for p India: Suits pertaining to a registered design also constituting a trade mark not maintainable for p](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/dfac0b_7c88074b5e8049fba6398b4bb79a4707~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_640,h_522,al_c,lg_1,q_85,enc_auto/dfac0b_7c88074b5e8049fba6398b4bb79a4707~mv2.png)
India: Suits pertaining to a registered design also constituting a trade mark not maintainable for p
![AJAY AMITABH SUMAN - Crocs Inc Vs Bata India-29.05.2019-Muralidhar, H.J. - Page 4-5 - Created with Publitas.com AJAY AMITABH SUMAN - Crocs Inc Vs Bata India-29.05.2019-Muralidhar, H.J. - Page 4-5 - Created with Publitas.com](https://view.publitas.com/59979/952806/pages/7b50c936ac2c7e6fc6c0cfea0847c9adc85a7ba3-at1600.jpg)